Simpson wants amnesty
PLUS: Nuclear energy, fake milk, and more
Note: I’ve heard from many readers who enjoy the Daily Digest format for Substack emails. I’ve also heard from others who prefer to see full articles in their email and don’t want to click through to read them at the Chronicle. I’m going to try to do both: full text articles with a short digest below on days I write a full article, full digest on days I don’t. Let me know what you think!
Amnesty is Back on the Menu
Earlier this month, Congressman Mike Simpson issued a press release touting H.R. 9535, the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act. The bill, cosponsored by Simpson and nearly fifty other Republicans, also drew praise from Big Ag lobbyists:
“The Idaho Dairymen’s Association thanks Congressman Mike Simpson for being an original cosponsor of the ‘Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.’ We are deeply grateful that the Congressman is once again showing that he is willing to lead on securing a workforce for Idaho’s dairy farms. Idaho’s farm families are the backbone of our state and having access to a secure, stable agricultural workforce is key to the economic success of those farms and our rural communities,” said Rick Naerebout, CEO of the Idaho Dairymen’s Association.
“America’s farmers and ranchers need a reliable, legal workforce to continue feeding our nation. The Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act is a practical step toward strengthening our agricultural workforce and ensuring the long-term viability of U.S. agriculture,” said Matt Dorsey, President of the Idaho Farm Bureau Federation.
Recall Rick Naerebout’s father, Bob, admitting in legislative testimony that up to 70% of the workforce at Idaho’s dairies could potentially be in the country illegally:
So what does H.R. 9535 actually do?
The bill would create a pathway to legal status for agricultural workers who are currently here illegally. They would be required to prove a history of employment in the agricultural industry, as well as pass a background check and pay a fee. Supporters of the bill say this is necessary to ensure a consistent supply of workers.
H.R. 9535 would also expand the H-2A visa program, which is currently used for seasonal agricultural workers. If passed, this bill would make H-2A visas available year-round for industries such as dairy and livestock production. Current law requires employers who use H-2A visas to first establish that there are no American workers available and that the visas will not negatively impact American wages. Under the new law, that certification would last for three years rather than just one.
Lobbyists from Idaho’s agricultural industry have been pushing for something like this for as long as I’ve been paying attention. Two and a half years ago, I wrote about a joint memorial that called for exactly what H.R. 9535 does: an expansion of H-2A visas for future workers and implicit amnesty for those workers here illegally:
The same people are back with a new memorial, without an explicit call for amnesty. Nevertheless, Senate Joint Memorial 102 once again comes from the perspective of big businesses that want to guarantee an endless supply of cheap labor.
Sen. Kevin Cook shared a newsletter last week lauding the new proposal, saying the memorial “underscores the urgency for a modernized approach that not only secures our nation’s borders but also meets the labor demands of domestic businesses.”
What kind of country are we when the “labor demands of domestic businesses” require a steady stream of cheap foreign workers? What happened to the idea of hiring Americans to do American jobs? Instead we encourage young people to spend years in college rather than learning the value of hard work.
On Monday, the McClure Center for Public Policy Research out of the University of Idaho gave a presentation on the supposed economic benefits of migration, both legal and illegal. According to the Center, more than 30,000 illegal aliens currently work in Idaho, which means that businesses and our entire economy depend upon their labor.
Sen. Glenneda Zuiderveld brought this up during debate on the Senate floor on Tuesday. Even though SJM102 explicitly rules out amnesty, it doesn’t say what must be done about the illegal aliens currently working in Idaho. Without mass deportations, some form of amnesty is inevitable, which means SJM102 implicitly endorses amnesty.
Big Ag lobbyists and their political allies engage in linguistic sleight-of-hand by saying they don’t support amnesty, just a pathway to legal status for current undocumented workers. That’s like if I said I don’t support mass deportations, just the expedited removal of those here without authorization. It’s the same thing, but they can craft headlines declaring their opposition to amnesty while putting literal amnesty into their legislation. Indeed, in February, as he was working on crafting H.R. 9535, Congressman Simpson did exactly that:
Thank you to everyone who participated in the meaningful conversations about the need for a stable, reliable, and legal agricultural workforce. A special thank you to Rick Naerebout and Zak Miller for their efforts here as well. Did you know that 85% of Idahoans, including 79% of Republicans, support legal status for dairy workers (who pass a background check and have no criminal record) and their families.
Let me be clear: making meaningful reforms to the H-2A visa program and establishing a strong, legal immigration workforce for agricultural producers is not an amnesty deal. I do not support amnesty. Our country needs a stable labor force to protect our food supply and ensure farmers can continue to do their jobs.
Either we have rule of law, or we don’t. Either we have a border, or we don’t. Either we have a country, or we don’t. It’s incredible that at the very moment when innovation in AI and automation stands to replace more low-skill jobs, and when the labor force participation rate remains lower than at any point in the past half-century outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, Republican congressmen are working to codify a permanent foreign agricultural workforce.
President Trump campaigned on mass deportations and enforcing the law with regard to immigration policy. Congressman Simpson has presented himself as one of the president’s biggest supporters since his second inauguration and is even now trying to portray H.R. 9535 as being in support of the president’s agenda, rather than a complete repudiation of it. The Trump Administration is removing those here illegally while also targeting the incentives that bring illegal aliens here in the first place, including public benefits, financial services, and, of course, jobs. Congress should stand up for Trump’s agenda and the rule of law by defeating this ill-conceived bill.
Congressman Simpson is unlikely to change his position on this legislation—after all, he’s a proud cosponsor—but feel free to call his office and respectfully register your disagreement anyway. I suggest calling Congressman Russ Fulcher as well and urging him to vote no on H.R. 9535.
Amnesty for those who come here illegally—breaking numerous laws in the process—is never acceptable. It’s time to remind Congress of that fact.
Feature image created with Microsoft Copilot.
Newsletters
Press Releases
Gov. Little cheers Idaho’s balanced budget at the close of FY2026
Sens. Crapo and Risch and Congressman Simpson celebrate nuclear tech hub
Video of the day
Jake the Lawyer makes a strong case against the 17th Amendment:
As you might recall, the Idaho GOP Platform officially calls for repealing the 17th Amendment.
You’ll have to let me know what you think of this hybrid format. If you’ve made it this far, check out the legislative committees page at Idaho Insider—I spent the weekend refining both it and the individual committee pages. By the time the 2027 session begins I intend Idaho Insider at the Gem State Chronicle to be the premiere source for information about your elected lawmakers.
As always, thank you to sponsors Lynn Bradescu’s Boise Realty, Money Metals, and New Saint Andrews College. Thank you also to all the paid subscribers who make it possible for me to do what I do, as well as all the readers who are constantly encouraging me to keep it up. I appreciate you!
Rep. Simpson has big Ag donors. No one can beat him in primaries or general elections. He knows this. So really, how much influence does the average Idahoan who opposes amnesty and illegal immigration really have on his votes in Congress?
He meets regularly with IACI stakeholders and touts his spending as Idaho’s “only appropriator.” He has shown no interest in conservative principles, so we certainly have no voice.
Congressman Fulcher also seems to have different priorities from his conservative constituency.
We have mostly given up on representatives from either party, especially in Washington DC. So very disappointing to those of us who moved to Idaho hoping for conservative representation at federal as well as state and local levels.