I have no quarrel with that, do it when the new leadership team comes in.
Regarding your final statement, that's exactly what the Dems said about SCOTUS and Roe v. Wade. "...political maneuvering to change the established precedent. When the precedent is wrong we change it.
I have no quarrel with that, do it when the new leadership team comes in.
Regarding your final statement, that's exactly what the Dems said about SCOTUS and Roe v. Wade. "...political maneuvering to change the established precedent. When the precedent is wrong we change it.
Perhaps Victor should have taken your advice in 2021 and not pushed such a drastic change in the middle of a term. All this is doing is restoring the way things had been done for decades prior to last year’s bylaw change.
I have no quarrel with that, do it when the new leadership team comes in.
Regarding your final statement, that's exactly what the Dems said about SCOTUS and Roe v. Wade. "...political maneuvering to change the established precedent. When the precedent is wrong we change it.
Perhaps Victor should have taken your advice in 2021 and not pushed such a drastic change in the middle of a term. All this is doing is restoring the way things had been done for decades prior to last year’s bylaw change.
I agree entirely, I would have left it alone. But bad personality politics to fix bad personality politics is neither statesmanship nor leadership.
And to that point, as you bring up AG Wasden, "what if" Raul had advised us that Victor was right?