Brian, well articulated. I’d like to see what are some measurable achievements you are thinking of. For example, Brad Little posted on “X” a chart showing correlation between Idaho regulations and Idaho GDP. They are inversely correlated. Correlation of course does not imply causation but there is a reasonable connection. Why not if a bill is introduced then, there must be a correlated identification of budgetary sources and a subsequent expense reduction someplace else to pay for the new bill? Maybe, for every bill introduced there must be an identification of 3 bills or regulations that will be removed?
I agree with your top priorities. Thank you for doing the work of articulating what I also want to see happen this next session.
Brian
Some instructions on how to testify in support of bills would be appreciated. Is video testimony possible for folks that can’t go to the capitol?
Thank you
Brian, well articulated. I’d like to see what are some measurable achievements you are thinking of. For example, Brad Little posted on “X” a chart showing correlation between Idaho regulations and Idaho GDP. They are inversely correlated. Correlation of course does not imply causation but there is a reasonable connection. Why not if a bill is introduced then, there must be a correlated identification of budgetary sources and a subsequent expense reduction someplace else to pay for the new bill? Maybe, for every bill introduced there must be an identification of 3 bills or regulations that will be removed?