Perhaps the solution is the prevent lobbyists from plying legislators with donuts 🍩 , coffee ☕️, and even more upgraded goodies! It’s so easy to become corrupted by money💰. Lobbyists are one way big Pharma got its clutches into everything -- especially our freedom. We must rein in such influence without stifling constitutional protections.
Brian, you have a great challenge ahead to stay true to your best self as you navigate your new role. We wish you well.
Brian, first of all I am delighted to have you as a "lobbyist" for IFF. I agree with all you've said in theory it's the actual application that grinds me to a stop. First amendment aside, it all comes down to access. Even if I could get a green card as a private citizen, waving my first amendment rights to seek redress would not get me on the lawn of the congress. Having access to unlimited cash, previous term or appointment etc, would greatly enhance my odds. Unfortunately, entering this field armed only with good intentions can be a road paved with frustration and disappointment.
I believe that anyone should have the opportunity be a lobbyist, should they desire. I also believe that the economic incentives should be blocked. Like most of society, I think lobbyists should be paid for the fruits of their labor. Take the money, power and influence out of the scheme and let them "seek redress" on a level playing field.
With regard to citizens crowding the legislature, I believe that this is our best hope to effect change. I am concerned that in this day and age its efficacy is questionable, ie: The Caldwell School Board.
I agree with Big E, hold fast! You are embarking on a monumental challenge. You have my prayers and support.
With a great amount of respect for your POV most of the time, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. There are going to be times that we don't benefit from having a one-sided law and in this particular case, I'm quite okay with that. I believe the damage not being done from either side far outweighs any benefit to be gained. Nothing that I read in your article prohibits the act of lobbying, only who is and is not permitted to do it for what seems to be a relatively short period of time. I actually applaud Jaron Crane and his Democratic counterpart for bringing this forward and believe that it's the right thing to do.That all said, I'm still a huge supporter of you and your efforts and thank you for what you do, it's very much appreciated!
Perhaps the solution is the prevent lobbyists from plying legislators with donuts 🍩 , coffee ☕️, and even more upgraded goodies! It’s so easy to become corrupted by money💰. Lobbyists are one way big Pharma got its clutches into everything -- especially our freedom. We must rein in such influence without stifling constitutional protections.
Brian, you have a great challenge ahead to stay true to your best self as you navigate your new role. We wish you well.
Brian, first of all I am delighted to have you as a "lobbyist" for IFF. I agree with all you've said in theory it's the actual application that grinds me to a stop. First amendment aside, it all comes down to access. Even if I could get a green card as a private citizen, waving my first amendment rights to seek redress would not get me on the lawn of the congress. Having access to unlimited cash, previous term or appointment etc, would greatly enhance my odds. Unfortunately, entering this field armed only with good intentions can be a road paved with frustration and disappointment.
I believe that anyone should have the opportunity be a lobbyist, should they desire. I also believe that the economic incentives should be blocked. Like most of society, I think lobbyists should be paid for the fruits of their labor. Take the money, power and influence out of the scheme and let them "seek redress" on a level playing field.
With regard to citizens crowding the legislature, I believe that this is our best hope to effect change. I am concerned that in this day and age its efficacy is questionable, ie: The Caldwell School Board.
I agree with Big E, hold fast! You are embarking on a monumental challenge. You have my prayers and support.
Well said, Mike!
With a great amount of respect for your POV most of the time, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. There are going to be times that we don't benefit from having a one-sided law and in this particular case, I'm quite okay with that. I believe the damage not being done from either side far outweighs any benefit to be gained. Nothing that I read in your article prohibits the act of lobbying, only who is and is not permitted to do it for what seems to be a relatively short period of time. I actually applaud Jaron Crane and his Democratic counterpart for bringing this forward and believe that it's the right thing to do.That all said, I'm still a huge supporter of you and your efforts and thank you for what you do, it's very much appreciated!